path: compare to diablo 2

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.63
, work
Weight: 0.59
, approach
Weight: 0.59
, string
Weight: 0.57
Siblings route
Weight: 0.68
, trail
Weight: 0.62
, line segment
Weight: 0.56
, boulder
Weight: 0.56
, wicca
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare to diablo 2 1.00
be better than diablo 3 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(path, compare to diablo 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(path, compare to diablo 2)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(path, compare to diablo 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(path, be better than diablo 3)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(path, compare to diablo 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(path, be better than diablo 3)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(path, compare to diablo 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(path, be better than diablo 3)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(path, compare to diablo 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(path, be better than diablo 3)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(path, compare to diablo 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(path, compare to diablo 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(path, compare to diablo 2)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(path, compare to diablo 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(path, compare to diablo 2)