path: is aviable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.63
, work
Weight: 0.59
, approach
Weight: 0.59
, string
Weight: 0.57
Siblings route
Weight: 0.68
, trail
Weight: 0.62
, line segment
Weight: 0.56
, boulder
Weight: 0.56
, wicca
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
is g10 1.00
is x40 1.00
is pdv 1.00
is cancelled 1.00
is aviable 1.00
is 66 1.00
is 1.00
was considered significatan 0.79
was important 66 0.79
is now expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(approach, is g10) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(path, is aviable)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(string, is now expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(path, is aviable)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(approach, is x40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(path, is aviable)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(work, was considered significatan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(path, is aviable)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(approach, is) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(path, is aviable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(approach, is)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(approach, is x40)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(approach, is g10)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(work, was considered significatan)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(string, is now expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(approach, is x40)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(approach, is g10)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(string, is now expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(approach, is)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(work, was considered significatan)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(route, is 66)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(route, was important 66)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(approach, is g10) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(path, is aviable)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(approach, is x40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(path, is aviable)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(approach, is) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(path, is aviable)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(string, is now expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(path, is aviable)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(work, was considered significatan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(path, is aviable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(route, is 66) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(route, is 66)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(route, was important 66) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(route, was important 66)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(path, is aviable)

Similarity expansion

0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(path, is cancelled)
0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(path, is cancelled)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(path, is cancelled)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(path, is cancelled)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(path, is aviable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(path, is aviable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(approach, is)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(approach, is x40)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(work, was considered significatan)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(approach, is g10)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(string, is now expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(route, is 66)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(route, was important 66)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(approach, is)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(approach, is x40)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(approach, is g10)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(work, was considered significatan)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(path, is aviable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(string, is now expensive)