path: is light visible

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.63
, work
Weight: 0.59
, approach
Weight: 0.59
, string
Weight: 0.57
Siblings route
Weight: 0.68
, trail
Weight: 0.62
, line segment
Weight: 0.56
, boulder
Weight: 0.56
, wicca
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
is light visible 1.00
is visible 0.94
light system 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(approach, light system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(path, is light visible)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(path, is light visible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(approach, light system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(path, is light visible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(approach, light system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(approach, light system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(path, is light visible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(path, is light visible)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(path, is light visible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(path, is light visible)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(path, is light visible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(path, is visible)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(path, is light visible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(path, is visible)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(path, is light visible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(path, is visible)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(path, is light visible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(path, is visible)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(path, is light visible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(path, is light visible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(path, is light visible)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(path, is light visible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(path, is light visible)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(path, is light visible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(approach, light system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(path, is light visible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(approach, light system)