patrol: was in police service

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.56
, police
Weight: 0.55
, operation
Weight: 0.54
, report
Weight: 0.53
, area
Weight: 0.52
Siblings police officer
Weight: 0.35
, state police
Weight: 0.35
, police department
Weight: 0.35
, escort service
Weight: 0.34
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in police service 1.00
be considered backbone of police department 0.81
backbone of police department 0.81
was in police service conceptualized 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(patrol, was in police service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(patrol, was in police service)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(patrol, was in police service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(patrol, backbone of police department)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(patrol, was in police service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(patrol, be considered backbone of police department)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(patrol, was in police service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(patrol, was in police service conceptualized)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(patrol, was in police service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(patrol, backbone of police department)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(patrol, was in police service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(patrol, was in police service conceptualized)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(patrol, was in police service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(patrol, be considered backbone of police department)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(patrol, was in police service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(patrol, was in police service conceptualized)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(patrol, was in police service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(patrol, be considered backbone of police department)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(patrol, was in police service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(patrol, backbone of police department)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(patrol, was in police service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(patrol, backbone of police department)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(patrol, was in police service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(patrol, was in police service conceptualized)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(patrol, was in police service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(patrol, be considered backbone of police department)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(patrol, was in police service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(patrol, was in police service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(patrol, was in police service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(patrol, was in police service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(patrol, was in police service)