pax: have in phrase pax

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.47
, utility
Weight: 0.46
, convention
Weight: 0.44
, con
Weight: 0.44
, event
Weight: 0.41
Siblings awk
Weight: 0.29
, parameter
Weight: 0.28
, noun
Weight: 0.28
, motif
Weight: 0.28
, derivation
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
have in phrase pax 1.00
have in phrase pax et bonum 0.88
is word 0.76
is phrases 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pax, have in phrase pax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(noun, is word)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pax, have in phrase pax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(noun, is phrases)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pax, have in phrase pax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(noun, is word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(noun, is word)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pax, have in phrase pax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(noun, is phrases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(noun, is phrases)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pax, have in phrase pax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(pax, have in phrase pax)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pax, have in phrase pax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pax, have in phrase pax et bonum)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pax, have in phrase pax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(pax, have in phrase pax et bonum)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pax, have in phrase pax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(pax, have in phrase pax et bonum)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pax, have in phrase pax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pax, have in phrase pax et bonum)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(pax, have in phrase pax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pax, have in phrase pax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pax, have in phrase pax)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pax, have in phrase pax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pax, have in phrase pax)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pax, have in phrase pax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(noun, is word)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pax, have in phrase pax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(noun, is phrases)