pay: be per view expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, property
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.58
Siblings stock option
Weight: 0.33
, charge
Weight: 0.32
, cover
Weight: 0.32
, save
Weight: 0.32
, amount
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be per view expensive 1.00
be per view 0.96
be effective per click 0.82
be important per click 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pay, be per view expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pay, be per view expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pay, be per view expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pay, be per view)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pay, be per view expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pay, be per view)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pay, be per view expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(pay, be per view)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pay, be per view expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pay, be effective per click)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pay, be per view expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pay, be effective per click)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pay, be per view expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pay, be important per click)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pay, be per view expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(pay, be important per click)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pay, be per view expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(pay, be effective per click)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pay, be per view expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(pay, be important per click)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pay, be per view expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pay, be important per click)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pay, be per view expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pay, be effective per click)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pay, be per view expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pay, be per view)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pay, be per view expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pay, be per view expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pay, be per view expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pay, be per view expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pay, be per view expensive)