pea: have weight watchers points

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.65
, vegetable
Weight: 0.64
, grain
Weight: 0.64
, legume
Weight: 0.63
Siblings black eyed pea
Weight: 0.66
, potato salad
Weight: 0.37
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.36
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.36
, clover
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have weight watchers points 1.00
have points on weight watchers 1.00
cause weight gain 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(grain, cause weight gain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pea, have weight watchers points)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pea, have weight watchers points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(grain, cause weight gain)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pea, have weight watchers points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(grain, cause weight gain)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(grain, cause weight gain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pea, have weight watchers points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pea, have weight watchers points)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pea, have weight watchers points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(pea, have weight watchers points)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pea, have weight watchers points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(pea, have points on weight watchers)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(pea, have weight watchers points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(pea, have points on weight watchers)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pea, have weight watchers points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pea, have points on weight watchers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pea, have weight watchers points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pea, have points on weight watchers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(pea, have weight watchers points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pea, have weight watchers points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pea, have weight watchers points)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pea, have weight watchers points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pea, have weight watchers points)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pea, have weight watchers points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(grain, cause weight gain)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pea, have weight watchers points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(grain, cause weight gain)