peach: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents color
Weight: 0.69
, fruit
Weight: 0.67
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.62
, crop
Weight: 0.61
Siblings nectarine
Weight: 0.60
, crab apple
Weight: 0.37
, strawberry
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, pear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be good for babies 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(peach, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for babies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(peach, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pear, be good for babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for babies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(peach, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(peach, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(peach, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(peach, be good for babies)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(peach, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(peach, be good for babies)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(peach, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(peach, be good for babies)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(peach, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(peach, be good for babies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(peach, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(peach, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(peach, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(peach, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(peach, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(peach, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(pear, be good for babies)