peak: be called peaks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.56
, landmark
Weight: 0.55
, area
Weight: 0.53
, value
Weight: 0.52
Siblings mont blanc
Weight: 0.58
, maximum
Weight: 0.56
, aconcagua
Weight: 0.55
, nanga parbat
Weight: 0.36
, lhotse
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called peaks 1.00
be called twin peaks 0.93
be with steep mountains 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(peak, be called peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(peak, be called peaks)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(peak, be called peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(peak, be called twin peaks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(peak, be called peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(peak, be called twin peaks)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(peak, be called peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(peak, be called twin peaks)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(peak, be called peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(peak, be called twin peaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(peak, be called peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(peak, be called peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(peak, be called peaks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(peak, be called peaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(peak, be called peaks)