peanut: be bad for men

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable oil
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.62
, commodity
Weight: 0.60
, child
Weight: 0.59
Siblings peanut butter
Weight: 0.78
, olive oil
Weight: 0.36
, pet food
Weight: 0.35
, castor oil
Weight: 0.35
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for men 1.00
be bad for dogs 0.79
be good for us 0.77
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(peanut, be bad for men)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(peanut, be bad for men)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(peanut butter, be bad for dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(olive oil, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(castor oil, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(peanut, be bad for men)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(peanut, be bad for men)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(peanut butter, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(peanut butter, be bad for dogs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(olive oil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(olive oil, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(castor oil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(castor oil, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(peanut, be bad for men)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(peanut, be bad for dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad for dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(peanut, be bad for dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(peanut, be bad for dogs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(peanut, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(peanut, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(peanut, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(peanut, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad for men)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(peanut, be bad for men)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(peanut butter, be bad for dogs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(olive oil, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(castor oil, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(peanut, be bad for men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)