peanut: be in food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable oil
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.62
, commodity
Weight: 0.60
, child
Weight: 0.59
Siblings peanut butter
Weight: 0.78
, olive oil
Weight: 0.36
, pet food
Weight: 0.35
, castor oil
Weight: 0.35
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in food 1.00
be called food 0.94
be used in food 0.94
have more energy than bread 0.77
be called food of brain 0.76
be in thai food 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(food, be called food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(peanut, be in food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(food, be called food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(food, be called food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(food, be called food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(peanut, be in food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(peanut, be in food)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(peanut, be used in food)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be called food)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be used in food)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(peanut, be called food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(peanut, be used in food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(peanut, have more energy than bread)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be called food of brain)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(peanut, be called food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(peanut, be used in food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(peanut, be called food)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(peanut, have more energy than bread)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(peanut, be called food of brain)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(peanut, have more energy than bread)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(peanut, have more energy than bread)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(peanut, be called food of brain)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(peanut, be called food of brain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be in food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(peanut, be in food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(food, be called food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(peanut, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(food, be called food)