peanut: taste bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable oil
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.62
, commodity
Weight: 0.60
, child
Weight: 0.59
Siblings peanut butter
Weight: 0.78
, olive oil
Weight: 0.36
, pet food
Weight: 0.35
, castor oil
Weight: 0.35
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste bad 1.00
taste sweet 0.89
taste better in shell 0.83
be in shell taste 0.81
has quality bad 0.80
taste like peanut butter 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(peanut, taste bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(peanut, taste bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(olive oil, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(castor oil, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(peanut, taste bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(peanut, taste bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(olive oil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(olive oil, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(castor oil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(castor oil, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(peanut, taste bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(peanut, taste better in shell)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(peanut, taste better in shell)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(peanut, taste better in shell)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(peanut, taste sweet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(peanut, taste sweet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(peanut, be in shell taste)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(peanut, taste better in shell)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(peanut, taste sweet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(peanut, be in shell taste)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(peanut, be in shell taste)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be in shell taste)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(peanut, taste sweet)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(peanut, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(peanut, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(peanut, taste like peanut butter)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(peanut, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(peanut, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(peanut, taste like peanut butter)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(peanut, taste like peanut butter)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(peanut, taste like peanut butter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(peanut, taste bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(peanut, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(olive oil, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(castor oil, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(peanut, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)