pear tree: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.82
, fruit
Weight: 0.72
, tree
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, plant
Weight: 0.51
Siblings apple tree
Weight: 0.45
, peach tree
Weight: 0.44
, oak tree
Weight: 0.43
, cherry tree
Weight: 0.43
, pear
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pear tree, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(pear tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(pear tree, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(pear tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(oak tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(oak tree, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(pear tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(pear tree, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(pear tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pear tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(pear tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pear tree, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(oak tree, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(pear tree, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)