pear: be figured hated bodies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.75
, flavor
Weight: 0.72
, fruit
Weight: 0.69
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.66
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pear tree
Weight: 0.42
, apple tree
Weight: 0.40
, peach tree
Weight: 0.40
, grape
Weight: 0.39
, crab apple
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be figured hated bodies 1.00
be good for body 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pear, be figured hated bodies)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(grape, be good for body)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pear, be figured hated bodies)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(grape, be good for body)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(grape, be good for body)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pear, be figured hated bodies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(pear, be figured hated bodies)

Similarity expansion

0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(pear, be figured hated bodies)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pear, be good for body)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(pear, be figured hated bodies)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for body)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pear, be figured hated bodies)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for body)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(pear, be figured hated bodies)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(pear, be good for body)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(pear, be figured hated bodies)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(pear, be figured hated bodies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pear, be figured hated bodies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pear, be figured hated bodies)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(pear, be figured hated bodies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pear, be figured hated bodies)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(grape, be good for body)