pear: has state pest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.75
, flavor
Weight: 0.72
, fruit
Weight: 0.69
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.66
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pear tree
Weight: 0.42
, apple tree
Weight: 0.40
, peach tree
Weight: 0.40
, grape
Weight: 0.39
, crab apple
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pest 1.00
be pest in australia 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(pear, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(pear, has state pest)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(pear, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pear, be pest in australia)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(pear, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pear, be pest in australia)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(pear, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(pear, be pest in australia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(pear, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pear, be pest in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(pear, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pear, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pear, has state pest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(pear, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pear, has state pest)