peasant: were dissatisfied with course of events

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents poor people
Weight: 0.56
, land
Weight: 0.55
, work
Weight: 0.49
, man
Weight: 0.49
Siblings farmer
Weight: 0.32
, young woman
Weight: 0.31
, plantation
Weight: 0.31
, young man
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
were dissatisfied with course of events 1.00
were dissatisfied with course of events by 1791-early 1792 0.99
were dissatisfied with course of events by late 1791-early 1792 0.98
were dissatisfied with course 0.96
were dissatisfied 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events by 1791-early 1792)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events by 1791-early 1792)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events by 1791-early 1792)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events by late 1791-early 1792)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events by 1791-early 1792)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events by late 1791-early 1792)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events by late 1791-early 1792)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events by late 1791-early 1792)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(peasant, were dissatisfied with course)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(peasant, were dissatisfied with course)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(peasant, were dissatisfied with course)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were dissatisfied with course)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(peasant, were dissatisfied)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(peasant, were dissatisfied)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(peasant, were dissatisfied)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were dissatisfied)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(peasant, were dissatisfied with course of events)