peasant: were treated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents poor people
Weight: 0.56
, land
Weight: 0.55
, work
Weight: 0.49
, man
Weight: 0.49
Siblings farmer
Weight: 0.32
, young woman
Weight: 0.31
, plantation
Weight: 0.31
, young man
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated 1.00
were treated badly 0.89
were treated in acient greece 0.84
were treated in greece 0.84
were treated during revolution 0.83
were treated during louis 0.78
were treated during french revolution 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(peasant, were treated)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(peasant, were treated during revolution)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were treated during revolution)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were treated badly)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(peasant, were treated during revolution)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(peasant, were treated badly)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(peasant, were treated during louis)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(peasant, were treated during french revolution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were treated during french revolution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were treated during louis)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(peasant, were treated during french revolution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(peasant, were treated during louis)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(peasant, were treated badly)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were treated in greece)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(peasant, were treated during revolution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were treated in acient greece)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(peasant, were treated during french revolution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(peasant, were treated during louis)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(peasant, were treated in greece)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(peasant, were treated badly)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(peasant, were treated in acient greece)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(peasant, were treated in greece)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(peasant, were treated in acient greece)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(peasant, were treated in acient greece)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(peasant, were treated in greece)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were treated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(peasant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(peasant, were treated)