pedophile: have voices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.63
, pervert
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, adult
Weight: 0.54
Siblings catholic priest
Weight: 0.34
, rapist
Weight: 0.34
, homosexual
Weight: 0.33
, cougar
Weight: 0.33
, spider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have voices 1.00
have high voices 0.95
have pitched voices 0.87
have high pitched voices 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pedophile, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(pedophile, have voices)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pedophile, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pedophile, have high voices)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pedophile, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pedophile, have pitched voices)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(pedophile, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(pedophile, have high voices)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pedophile, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(pedophile, have high pitched voices)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pedophile, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(pedophile, have high voices)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pedophile, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(pedophile, have pitched voices)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pedophile, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(pedophile, have high pitched voices)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pedophile, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pedophile, have high voices)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pedophile, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(pedophile, have high pitched voices)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pedophile, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pedophile, have pitched voices)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(pedophile, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pedophile, have high pitched voices)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(pedophile, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(pedophile, have pitched voices)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(pedophile, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(pedophile, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pedophile, have voices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pedophile, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(pedophile, have voices)