pedophilia: be common in positions of power

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.63
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pornography
Weight: 0.36
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.35
, adultery
Weight: 0.34
, obsessive compulsive disorder
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be common in positions of power 1.00
be common in positions 0.96
be more common in areas 0.78
is common 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is common)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(adultery, is common)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(adultery, is common)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be common in positions)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is common)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be common in positions)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is common)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be common in positions)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is common)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be common in positions)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is common)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be common in positions of power)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(adultery, is common)