pelvic inflammatory disease: be due to salpingitis treated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disease
Weight: 0.80
, infection
Weight: 0.77
, inflammation
Weight: 0.75
, complication
Weight: 0.74
, condition
Weight: 0.72
Siblings appendicitis
Weight: 0.64
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.41
, infective endocarditis
Weight: 0.39
, genital herpes
Weight: 0.39
, candidiasis
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be due to salpingitis treated 1.00
be due to acute salpingitis treated 0.91
be due to salpingitis 0.89
be treated 0.88
is treated 0.87
were treated in 1700s 0.87
were treated in time 0.86
be due to acute salpingitis 0.83
needed treated 0.83
be treated on level 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(disease, were treated in 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(disease, be treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(infection, be treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(infection, be treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(infection, be treated)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(infection, be treated)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(disease, be treated)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(disease, were treated in 1700s)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(disease, were treated in 1700s)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(disease, be treated)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(infection, be treated)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(infection, be treated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(candidiasis, be treated)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be treated on level)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be treated)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(candidiasis, is treated)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(infective endocarditis, be treated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(disease, were treated in 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(disease, be treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(infection, be treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(infection, be treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(infective endocarditis, be treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(infective endocarditis, be treated)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(lyme disease, be treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be treated)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(candidiasis, is treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(candidiasis, is treated)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(candidiasis, be treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(candidiasis, be treated)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(lyme disease, be treated on level) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be treated on level)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to acute salpingitis treated)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to acute salpingitis treated)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to acute salpingitis treated)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to acute salpingitis)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to acute salpingitis)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to acute salpingitis)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to acute salpingitis treated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to acute salpingitis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(infection, be treated)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(infection, be treated)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(disease, be treated)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(disease, were treated in 1700s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(infective endocarditis, be treated)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be treated)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(candidiasis, is treated)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be treated on level)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(candidiasis, be treated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(infection, be treated)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(infection, be treated)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(disease, be treated)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, be due to salpingitis treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(disease, were treated in 1700s)