pen: have hole in cap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.63
, gift
Weight: 0.60
, name
Weight: 0.59
, object
Weight: 0.58
, marker
Weight: 0.57
Siblings ballpoint pen
Weight: 0.89
, fountain pen
Weight: 0.76
, sharpie
Weight: 0.58
, pencil
Weight: 0.34
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have hole in cap 1.00
have holes in cap 0.97
have hole in middle 0.86
have hole in side 0.84
has physical part hole 0.83
have clips on cap 0.82
have caps 0.80
have holes in them 0.80
need caps 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(pencil, have holes in them)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, have holes in them)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pocket knife, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pocket knife, have holes in them)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(pencil, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pencil, have holes in them)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(pen, have hole in cap)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(pen, have holes in cap)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(pen, have holes in cap)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(pen, have holes in cap)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pen, have holes in cap)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(pen, have clips on cap)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(pen, have clips on cap)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pen, have hole in middle)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(pen, have hole in side)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(pen, have hole in side)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(pen, have hole in middle)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(pen, have hole in side)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(pen, has physical part hole)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(pen, has physical part hole)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pen, have hole in middle)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(pen, have caps)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pen, have caps)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(pen, has physical part hole)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(pen, have caps)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pen, have clips on cap)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pen, have hole in side)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(pen, need caps)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pen, need caps)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pen, have hole in middle)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pen, need caps)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(pen, have holes in them)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pen, have holes in them)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(pen, has physical part hole)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(pen, have holes in them)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pen, have holes in them)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(pen, have clips on cap)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(pen, have caps)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(pen, need caps)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(pen, have hole in cap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pen, have hole in cap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pocket knife, have holes in them)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(pen, have hole in cap)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pencil, have holes in them)