penetration: sting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, service
Weight: 0.52
, issue
Weight: 0.50
, process
Weight: 0.50
Siblings saturation
Weight: 0.32
, presence
Weight: 0.32
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.31
, prevalence
Weight: 0.31
, depth
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
sting 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(penetration, sting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(penetration, sting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(penetration, sting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(penetration, sting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(penetration, sting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(penetration, sting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(penetration, sting)