pennsylvania: was most successful proprietary colony

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
, new york city
Weight: 0.59
, new england
Weight: 0.57
Siblings west virginia
Weight: 0.76
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.63
, indiana
Weight: 0.60
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was most successful proprietary colony 1.00
was successful proprietary colony 0.99
was proprietary colony 0.96
was most successful colony 0.87
was successful colony 0.85
is best colony 0.80
was best colony 0.80
was was diverse colony 0.80
was good colony live in 0.77
was was most religiously diverse colony 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is best colony)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best colony)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(massachusetts, is best colony)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best colony)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(connecticut, is best colony)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is best colony)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, is best colony)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, was best colony)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, was was most religiously diverse colony)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, was good colony live in)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best colony)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best colony)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was best colony)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was best colony)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was was most religiously diverse colony)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was was most religiously diverse colony)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was good colony live in)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was good colony live in)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best colony)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was best colony)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was good colony live in)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was was most religiously diverse colony)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best colony)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was most successful proprietary colony)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best colony)