:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(peony, zone)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(aster, zone)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(peony, zone)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, zone)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(peony, zone)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(aster, zone)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(aster, zone)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(peony, zone)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(hydrangea, zone)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(hydrangea, zone)
Salient implies Plausible
0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(peony, zone)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(peony, zone)
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(peony, zone)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(peony, zone)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(peony, zone)
Typical implies Plausible
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(peony, zone)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(peony, zone)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(peony, zone)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hydrangea, zone)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(peony, zone)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(aster, zone)