pepper: be eaten

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tomato sauce
Weight: 0.65
, spice
Weight: 0.63
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.62
, vegetable
Weight: 0.60
, crop
Weight: 0.59
Siblings capsicum
Weight: 0.52
, black pepper
Weight: 0.39
, cumin
Weight: 0.36
, coriander
Weight: 0.36
, allspice
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be eaten 1.00
get cooked out of food 0.79
be better than eating 0.79
is cooked 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vegetable, be better than eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pepper, be eaten)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(spice, get cooked out of food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pepper, be eaten)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pepper, be eaten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(spice, get cooked out of food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pepper, be eaten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be better than eating)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be eaten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(spice, get cooked out of food)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be eaten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be better than eating)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vegetable, be better than eating) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pepper, be eaten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(pepper, be eaten)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(spice, get cooked out of food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pepper, be eaten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(pepper, be eaten)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pepper, be eaten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(pepper, be eaten)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(pepper, be eaten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pepper, be eaten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be eaten)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pepper, be eaten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pepper, be eaten)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be eaten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spice, get cooked out of food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be eaten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vegetable, be better than eating)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pepper, be eaten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spice, get cooked out of food)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pepper, be eaten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(vegetable, be better than eating)