pepsi: be cold

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.66
, beverage
Weight: 0.65
, soft drink
Weight: 0.63
, product
Weight: 0.61
, company
Weight: 0.60
Siblings toyota
Weight: 0.35
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.35
, coca cola
Weight: 0.35
, soda pop
Weight: 0.35
, diet coke
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cold 1.00
be serve cold 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(soda pop, be serve cold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pepsi, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(soda pop, be serve cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(soda pop, be serve cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pepsi, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(pepsi, be cold)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(pepsi, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pepsi, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pepsi, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pepsi, be cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(soda pop, be serve cold)