pepsi: have caffeine

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.66
, beverage
Weight: 0.65
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.63
, product
Weight: 0.61
Siblings soda pop
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.35
, starbucks
Weight: 0.35
, toyota
Weight: 0.35
, cola
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have caffeine 1.00
is drink 0.76
be free aspartame 0.75
have again aspartame 0.75
use again aspartame 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(soft drink, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pepsi, have caffeine)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(soft drink, have caffeine)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, have caffeine)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, have caffeine)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cola, have caffeine)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(soda, have caffeine)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(soda, is drink)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(soft drink, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pepsi, have caffeine)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(soda, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(soda, have caffeine)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cola, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cola, have caffeine)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starbucks, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(starbucks, have caffeine)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(soda, is drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(soda, is drink)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(pepsi, have caffeine)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be free aspartame)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pepsi, is drink)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, use again aspartame)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, have again aspartame)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, is drink)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, have caffeine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pepsi, have caffeine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(soft drink, have caffeine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(soda, have caffeine)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cola, have caffeine)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(soda, is drink)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(starbucks, have caffeine)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(pepsi, have caffeine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(soft drink, have caffeine)