performance: be measured in activity-based management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.66
, record
Weight: 0.65
, discipline
Weight: 0.64
, success
Weight: 0.64
, display
Weight: 0.63
Siblings recording
Weight: 0.64
, achievement
Weight: 0.34
, accuracy
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.33
, tensile strength
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be measured in management 1.00
be measured in activity-based management 1.00
be measured 0.88
is measured 0.88
is management 0.87
management 0.86
be measured by money 0.81
be important in measurement 0.80
be important during measurement 0.80
is management issue 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(quality, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(record, management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(quality, is measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(record, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(success, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(success, be measured by money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(success, be measured)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(success, be measured by money)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(quality, is measured)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(record, is management)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(quality, be measured)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(record, management)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(quality, is measured)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(quality, be measured)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured by money)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(record, management)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(record, is management)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important during measurement)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be important in measurement)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be measured)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(achievement, be measured)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in measurement)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(quality, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(record, management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(quality, is measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(record, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(success, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(success, be measured by money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(accuracy, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be measured)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(achievement, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(achievement, be measured)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(consistency, be important in measurement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in measurement)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(accuracy, be important during measurement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important during measurement)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(accuracy, be important in measurement) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be important in measurement)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(performance, be measured in activity-based management)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(performance, is measured)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(performance, be measured)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(performance, is measured)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(performance, be measured)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in management)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(performance, be measured in management)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(performance, be measured in management)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(performance, be measured)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(performance, is measured)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(performance, be measured in management)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(performance, is management)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(performance, is management)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(performance, is management)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(performance, is management)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(performance, is measured)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(success, be measured)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(record, is management)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(record, management)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(quality, is measured)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(quality, be measured)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(success, be measured by money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(accuracy, be measured)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(achievement, be measured)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in measurement)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important during measurement)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(accuracy, be important in measurement)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(success, be measured)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(record, is management)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(record, management)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(quality, is measured)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(quality, be measured)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(success, be measured by money)