performer: have earpieces

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents star
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.59
, songwriter
Weight: 0.56
, figure
Weight: 0.56
Siblings singer
Weight: 0.68
, musician
Weight: 0.64
, actor
Weight: 0.64
, tom jones
Weight: 0.61
, mentor
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
have earpieces 1.00
wear earpieces 0.98
wear earphones 0.82
wear headphones 0.80
wear earbuds 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(artist, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(performer, have earpieces)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(artist, wear headphones)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(artist, wear headphones)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(singer, wear headphones)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(singer, have earpieces)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(musician, wear headphones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(artist, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(performer, have earpieces)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(singer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(singer, have earpieces)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(singer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(singer, wear headphones)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(musician, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(musician, wear headphones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(performer, have earpieces)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear earpieces)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(performer, wear earpieces)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(performer, wear earpieces)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear earbuds)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear earphones)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(performer, wear earpieces)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(performer, wear headphones)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(performer, wear earbuds)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(performer, wear earbuds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(performer, wear earphones)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(performer, wear earphones)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(performer, wear headphones)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(performer, wear earbuds)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(performer, wear earphones)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(performer, wear headphones)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(performer, wear headphones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(performer, have earpieces)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(performer, have earpieces)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(artist, wear headphones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(singer, have earpieces)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(singer, wear headphones)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(musician, wear headphones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(performer, have earpieces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(artist, wear headphones)