person: be more in love

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents elderly person
Weight: 0.80
, other person
Weight: 0.80
, human being
Weight: 0.68
, foreigner
Weight: 0.65
Siblings homeless person
Weight: 0.82
, one person
Weight: 0.81
, dead person
Weight: 0.78
, married person
Weight: 0.71
, public servant
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more in love 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(person, be more in love)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(one person, be more in love)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(person, be more in love)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(one person, be more in love)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(one person, be more in love)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(person, be more in love)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(person, be more in love)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(person, be more in love)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(person, be more in love)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(person, be more in love)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(person, be more in love)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(person, be more in love)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(person, be more in love)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(one person, be more in love)