perth: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.54
, town
Weight: 0.51
, country
Weight: 0.48
Siblings sydney
Weight: 0.35
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34
, adelaide
Weight: 0.34
, auckland
Weight: 0.34
, mexico city
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(perth, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(perth, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(city, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(perth, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(city, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(perth, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(perth, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(perth, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(perth, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(perth, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(perth, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(perth, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(perth, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(perth, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(perth, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(perth, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(perth, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(perth, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(perth, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(perth, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(perth, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(perth, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(perth, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(city, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(perth, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(city, has quality good)