:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(city, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(perth, is city)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(perth, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(city, is city)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(perth, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(city, is city)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(perth, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, is city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(perth, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, is city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(perth, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sydney, is city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(perth, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(auckland, is city)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(city, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(perth, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(perth, is city)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(perth, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(perth, is city)
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(perth, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(perth, is city)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(perth, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, is city)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(perth, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(auckland, is city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(perth, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(brisbane, is city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(perth, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(sydney, is city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(perth, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(adelaide, is city)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(perth, is city)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, is city)