pet food: be fit for consumption

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.88
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
, product
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.64
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.87
, fast food
Weight: 0.41
, fresh food
Weight: 0.41
, junk food
Weight: 0.41
, canned food
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be fit for consumption 1.00
be fit for human consumption 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be fit for consumption) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be fit for consumption)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be fit for consumption) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be fit for human consumption)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(pet food, be fit for consumption) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(dog food, be fit for human consumption) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(dog food, be fit for human consumption)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(pet food, be fit for consumption) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(dog food, be fit for consumption) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(dog food, be fit for consumption)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(pet food, be fit for consumption) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(pet food, be fit for consumption)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(pet food, be fit for consumption) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pet food, be fit for human consumption)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(pet food, be fit for consumption) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pet food, be fit for human consumption)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pet food, be fit for consumption) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be fit for human consumption)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(pet food, be fit for consumption) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pet food, be fit for human consumption)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(pet food, be fit for consumption) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(pet food, be fit for consumption) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be fit for consumption)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(pet food, be fit for consumption) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(pet food, be fit for consumption)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be fit for consumption) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(dog food, be fit for human consumption)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be fit for consumption) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(dog food, be fit for consumption)