pet food: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.88
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
, product
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.64
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.87
, fast food
Weight: 0.41
, fresh food
Weight: 0.41
, junk food
Weight: 0.41
, canned food
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pet food, go bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(food, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(food, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(canned food, go bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(canned food, go bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pet food, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(canned food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(canned food, go bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(canned food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(canned food, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(pet food, go bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pet food, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pet food, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(food, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(canned food, go bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(canned food, go bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(food, go bad)