pet: be bad at home

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
, friend
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings hamster
Weight: 0.74
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.71
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, snake
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad at home 1.00
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pet, be bad at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pet, be bad at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(guinea pig, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pet, be bad at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(pet, be bad at home)

Similarity expansion

0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(pet, be bad at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pet, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pet, be bad at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pet, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pet, be bad at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pet, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(pet, be bad at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pet, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(pet, be bad at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pet, be bad at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pet, be bad at home)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pet, be bad at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pet, be bad at home)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pet, be bad at home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(guinea pig, has quality bad)