petal: be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, herb
Weight: 0.53
, flavor
Weight: 0.52
, element
Weight: 0.52
Siblings sepal
Weight: 0.35
, aloe vera
Weight: 0.33
, flower arrangement
Weight: 0.33
, angelica
Weight: 0.32
, jasmine
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals 1.00
be on flowers different from flowers pollinated 0.99
be on flowers different from flowers 0.93
be on flowers different 0.92
be on flowers 0.92
have flowers 0.92
be to flowers 0.92
help flowers 0.90
fall off flowers 0.87
be important to flower 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(sepal, be to flowers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(sepal, be important to flower)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(sepal, be to flowers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sepal, be to flowers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(sepal, be important to flower)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sepal, be important to flower)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(petal, be on flowers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(petal, be on flowers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(petal, be on flowers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(petal, have flowers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(petal, be to flowers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(petal, be on flowers different from flowers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(petal, be on flowers different)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(petal, fall off flowers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(petal, fall off flowers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(petal, fall off flowers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(petal, have flowers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(petal, be to flowers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(petal, have flowers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(petal, be on flowers different)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(petal, help flowers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(petal, be to flowers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(petal, be on flowers different)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(petal, fall off flowers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(petal, be on flowers different from flowers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(petal, help flowers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(petal, help flowers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(petal, be important to flower)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(petal, be on flowers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(petal, be to flowers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(petal, be important to flower)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(petal, be important to flower)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(petal, help flowers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(petal, have flowers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(petal, be important to flower)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sepal, be to flowers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sepal, be important to flower)