phagocytosis: be ineffective against viruses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, immune response
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.57
, mechanism
Weight: 0.52
Siblings apoptosis
Weight: 0.36
, macrophage
Weight: 0.35
, oxidative phosphorylation
Weight: 0.35
, hydrolysis
Weight: 0.35
, cellular respiration
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be ineffective against viruses 1.00
be ineffective against tuberculosis 0.85
be used by bacteria 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be ineffective against viruses)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(macrophage, be ineffective against tuberculosis)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be ineffective against viruses)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hydrolysis, be used by bacteria)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(phagocytosis, be ineffective against viruses)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(macrophage, be ineffective against tuberculosis)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(macrophage, be ineffective against tuberculosis)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(phagocytosis, be ineffective against viruses)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(hydrolysis, be used by bacteria)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hydrolysis, be used by bacteria)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(phagocytosis, be ineffective against viruses)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(phagocytosis, be ineffective against viruses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(phagocytosis, be ineffective against viruses)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, be ineffective against viruses)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be ineffective against viruses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(phagocytosis, be ineffective against viruses)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, be ineffective against viruses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be ineffective against viruses)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hydrolysis, be used by bacteria)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be ineffective against viruses)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(macrophage, be ineffective against tuberculosis)