pharmaceuticals: be made

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.48
, environment
Weight: 0.28
Siblings banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, chemicals
Weight: 0.31
, electronics
Weight: 0.31
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be made 1.00
were made 0.93
be used making 0.88
be how made 0.80
help make 0.77
be made for distribution 0.76
be all made in china 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(environment, be how made)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, be made)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(environment, be how made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(environment, be how made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be made)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(electronics, were made)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be all made in china)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(electronics, help make)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(environment, be how made)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be made)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(electronics, be made)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(electronics, be made)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(electronics, were made)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(electronics, were made)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(electronics, be all made in china)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(electronics, be all made in china)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(electronics, help make)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(electronics, help make)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(pharmaceuticals, be made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be made)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, be made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(environment, be how made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(electronics, be made)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(electronics, were made)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(electronics, be all made in china)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(electronics, help make)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(pharmaceuticals, be made)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(environment, be how made)