pharmacist: be satisfied with jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents doctor
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.64
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, health
Weight: 0.59
, physician
Weight: 0.57
Siblings medical doctor
Weight: 0.38
, gynecologist
Weight: 0.36
, dentist
Weight: 0.35
, salesperson
Weight: 0.34
, clinic
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be satisfied with jobs 1.00
have jobs 0.81
is unhappy 0.78
has state jobs 0.78
hate jobs 0.77
is good job 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(physician, is unhappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(physician, is unhappy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(physician, is unhappy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dentist, is good job)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(physician, is unhappy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(dentist, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(dentist, is good job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(pharmacist, have jobs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pharmacist, have jobs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(pharmacist, hate jobs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pharmacist, hate jobs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, hate jobs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(pharmacist, have jobs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pharmacist, hate jobs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(pharmacist, is unhappy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(pharmacist, has state jobs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, is unhappy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pharmacist, is good job)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(pharmacist, has state jobs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, has state jobs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pharmacist, has state jobs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pharmacist, is unhappy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pharmacist, is good job)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(pharmacist, is good job)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pharmacist, is unhappy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, is good job)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, have jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(physician, is unhappy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dentist, is good job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pharmacist, be satisfied with jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(physician, is unhappy)