pharmacist: does make in year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents doctor
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.64
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, health
Weight: 0.59
, physician
Weight: 0.57
Siblings medical doctor
Weight: 0.38
, gynecologist
Weight: 0.36
, dentist
Weight: 0.35
, salesperson
Weight: 0.34
, clinic
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
does make in year 1.00
do 0.82
make more 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, does make in year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(gynecologist, do)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pharmacist, does make in year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(gynecologist, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(gynecologist, do)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pharmacist, does make in year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(pharmacist, does make in year)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pharmacist, does make in year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(pharmacist, do)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pharmacist, does make in year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(pharmacist, do)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pharmacist, does make in year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(pharmacist, do)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pharmacist, does make in year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pharmacist, make more)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pharmacist, does make in year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(pharmacist, make more)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pharmacist, does make in year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pharmacist, make more)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(pharmacist, does make in year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, make more)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(pharmacist, does make in year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, do)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pharmacist, does make in year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pharmacist, does make in year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, does make in year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pharmacist, does make in year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pharmacist, does make in year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, does make in year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(gynecologist, do)