phase: be in mitosis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, effect
Weight: 0.59
, system
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bronze age
Weight: 0.46
, metaphase
Weight: 0.39
, biotite
Weight: 0.38
, rutile
Weight: 0.34
, cycle
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in mitosis 1.00
be in meiosis 0.85
be called secretory phase 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(metaphase, be in mitosis)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(metaphase, be in meiosis)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(metaphase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(metaphase, be in mitosis)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(metaphase, be in meiosis)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(metaphase, be in meiosis)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(phase, be in mitosis)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(phase, be in meiosis)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(phase, be in meiosis)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(phase, be in meiosis)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(phase, be called secretory phase)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(phase, be in meiosis)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(phase, be called secretory phase)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(phase, be called secretory phase)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(phase, be called secretory phase)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(phase, be in mitosis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(phase, be in mitosis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(metaphase, be in mitosis)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(phase, be in mitosis)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(metaphase, be in meiosis)