phase: is efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, effect
Weight: 0.59
, system
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bronze age
Weight: 0.46
, metaphase
Weight: 0.39
, biotite
Weight: 0.38
, rutile
Weight: 0.34
, cycle
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is efficient 1.00
is more efficient 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(system, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(phase, is efficient)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(phase, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(system, is more efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(phase, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(system, is more efficient)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(system, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(phase, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(phase, is efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(phase, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(phase, is efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(phase, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(phase, is more efficient)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(phase, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(phase, is more efficient)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(phase, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(phase, is more efficient)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(phase, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(phase, is more efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(phase, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(phase, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(phase, is efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(phase, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(phase, is efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(phase, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(system, is more efficient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(phase, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(system, is more efficient)