philosopher: have awful voices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents poet
Weight: 0.69
, writer
Weight: 0.67
, man
Weight: 0.67
, figure
Weight: 0.65
, scholar
Weight: 0.64
Siblings karl marx
Weight: 0.72
, david hume
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
have awful voices 1.00
have voices 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(philosopher, have awful voices)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(philosopher, have awful voices) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(man, have voices)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(philosopher, have awful voices) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(man, have voices)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, have voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(philosopher, have awful voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(philosopher, have awful voices)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(philosopher, have awful voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(philosopher, have awful voices)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(philosopher, have awful voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(philosopher, have voices)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(philosopher, have awful voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(philosopher, have voices)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(philosopher, have awful voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(philosopher, have voices)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(philosopher, have awful voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(philosopher, have voices)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(philosopher, have awful voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(philosopher, have awful voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(philosopher, have awful voices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(philosopher, have awful voices) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(philosopher, have awful voices)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(philosopher, have awful voices) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, have voices)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(philosopher, have awful voices) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, have voices)