philosophy: be defined as love of knowledge

Related concepts

Parents	discipline Weight: 0.67 , program Weight: 0.65 , view Weight: 0.65 , attitude Weight: 0.62
Siblings	buddhism Weight: 0.66 , experience Weight: 0.64 , materialism Weight: 0.64 , mathematics Weight: 0.64 , atheism Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be defined as love of knowledge	1.00
requires knowledge	0.85
be defined as language of nature	0.77
be defined as language of god	0.76
requires aptitude not share by everyone	0.76
increase knowledge	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(program, requires knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(program, requires knowledge)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(program, requires knowledge)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, requires aptitude not share by everyone)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(experience, increase knowledge)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be defined as language of god)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be defined as language of nature)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(program, requires knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(experience, increase knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(experience, increase knowledge)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(mathematics, be defined as language of nature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(mathematics, be defined as language of nature)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(mathematics, be defined as language of god) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(mathematics, be defined as language of god)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(mathematics, requires aptitude not share by everyone) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(mathematics, requires aptitude not share by everyone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(program, requires knowledge)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(mathematics, be defined as language of nature)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(mathematics, be defined as language of god)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(mathematics, requires aptitude not share by everyone)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(experience, increase knowledge)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.27

Typical(philosophy, be defined as love of knowledge) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(program, requires knowledge)