philosophy: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.67
, theme
Weight: 0.66
, approach
Weight: 0.66
, program
Weight: 0.65
Siblings buddhism
Weight: 0.66
, libertarianism
Weight: 0.65
, experience
Weight: 0.64
, materialism
Weight: 0.64
, mathematics
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
be important to socrates 0.79
is practical 0.76
be important tool for scientists 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(approach, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(philosophy, is useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(philosophy, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(approach, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(approach, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important tool for scientists)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(approach, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(philosophy, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(philosophy, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(philosophy, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mathematics, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is useful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(philosophy, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(mathematics, be important tool for scientists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important tool for scientists)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(philosophy, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(philosophy, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(philosophy, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(philosophy, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(philosophy, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(philosophy, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(approach, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(mathematics, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important tool for scientists)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(philosophy, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(approach, is useful)