phone: be at neighbor house

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.79
, cell phone
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, personal computer
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cellular phone
Weight: 0.81
, phone book
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, modem
Weight: 0.61
, cellphone
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at neighbor house 1.00
be at house 0.87
be at your house 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cell phone, be at house)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(phone, be at neighbor house)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(phone, be at neighbor house)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be at house)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(phone, be at neighbor house)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be at house)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cell phone, be at house)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(phone, be at neighbor house)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(phone, be at neighbor house)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(phone, be at neighbor house)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(phone, be at neighbor house)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(phone, be at neighbor house)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(phone, be at your house)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(phone, be at neighbor house)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(phone, be at your house)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(phone, be at neighbor house)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(phone, be at your house)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(phone, be at neighbor house)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(phone, be at your house)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(phone, be at neighbor house)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(phone, be at neighbor house)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(phone, be at neighbor house)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(phone, be at neighbor house)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(phone, be at neighbor house)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(phone, be at neighbor house)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cell phone, be at house)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(phone, be at neighbor house)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cell phone, be at house)