phone: be different from phones used long ago

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.79
, cell phone
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, personal computer
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cellular phone
Weight: 0.81
, phone book
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, headset
Weight: 0.58
, thunderbolt
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from phones used long ago 1.00
be different from phones used ago 0.98
be different from phones used 0.92
be different from phones 0.91
have phones 0.85
be from 1912 different from phone 0.84
be from 1912 different from phone today 0.84
be called phones 0.84
have dumb phones 0.82
be called cellular phones 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mobile phone, be called cellular phones)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(phone, be different from phones used long ago)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be called cellular phones)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be called cellular phones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mobile phone, be called cellular phones)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(phone, be different from phones used long ago)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(phone, be different from phones used long ago)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(phone, be from 1912 different from phone today)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(phone, have dumb phones)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(phone, be called cellular phones)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(phone, be from 1912 different from phone today)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(phone, be called cellular phones)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(phone, have dumb phones)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(phone, be called cellular phones)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(phone, be called cellular phones)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(phone, be from 1912 different from phone today)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(phone, have dumb phones)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(phone, be from 1912 different from phone today)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(phone, have dumb phones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(phone, be different from phones used long ago)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(phone, be different from phones used long ago)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be called cellular phones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be called cellular phones)