phone: be rectangular in shape

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.79
, cell phone
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, personal computer
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cellular phone
Weight: 0.81
, phone book
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, headset
Weight: 0.58
, thunderbolt
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rectangular in shape 1.00
is rectangular 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mobile phone, be rectangular in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(phone, be rectangular in shape)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(phone, be rectangular in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be rectangular in shape)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(phone, be rectangular in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be rectangular in shape)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mobile phone, be rectangular in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(phone, be rectangular in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(phone, be rectangular in shape)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(phone, be rectangular in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(phone, be rectangular in shape)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(phone, be rectangular in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(phone, is rectangular)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(phone, be rectangular in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(phone, is rectangular)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(phone, be rectangular in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(phone, is rectangular)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(phone, be rectangular in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(phone, is rectangular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(phone, be rectangular in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(phone, be rectangular in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(phone, be rectangular in shape)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(phone, be rectangular in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(phone, be rectangular in shape)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(phone, be rectangular in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be rectangular in shape)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(phone, be rectangular in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be rectangular in shape)