photo: be pixelated in indesign

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents image
Weight: 0.64
, piece
Weight: 0.64
, keepsake
Weight: 0.60
, collage
Weight: 0.60
Siblings tag
Weight: 0.58
, headshot
Weight: 0.54
, caption
Weight: 0.51
, mug
Weight: 0.50
, photograph
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be pixelated in indesign 1.00
show up black in indesign 0.87
is pixelated 0.87
be pixelated on instagram 0.87
get pixelated 0.86
become pixelated 0.85
appear pixelated 0.84
be greyed out in lightroom 0.82
turn in photoshop 0.80
become in photoshop 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(image, become in photoshop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(photo, be pixelated in indesign)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(image, turn in photoshop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(photo, be pixelated in indesign)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(image, turn in photoshop)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(image, become in photoshop)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(image, turn in photoshop)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(image, become in photoshop)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(image, become in photoshop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(photo, be pixelated in indesign)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(image, turn in photoshop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(photo, be pixelated in indesign)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(photo, be pixelated in indesign)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(photo, be greyed out in lightroom)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(photo, be greyed out in lightroom)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(photo, be greyed out in lightroom)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(photo, be pixelated on instagram)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(photo, be greyed out in lightroom)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(photo, be pixelated on instagram)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(photo, be pixelated on instagram)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(photo, be pixelated on instagram)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(photo, be pixelated in indesign)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(photo, be pixelated in indesign)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(image, become in photoshop)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(image, turn in photoshop)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(image, become in photoshop)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(photo, be pixelated in indesign) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(image, turn in photoshop)