photo: look better in white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents image
Weight: 0.64
, piece
Weight: 0.64
, keepsake
Weight: 0.60
, collage
Weight: 0.60
Siblings tag
Weight: 0.58
, headshot
Weight: 0.54
, caption
Weight: 0.51
, mug
Weight: 0.50
, photograph
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
look better in white 1.00
look better in black 0.97
look better 0.92
look better on snapchat 0.92
look better in light 0.90
look better in natural light 0.86
look brown 0.86
look different 0.85
look bad 0.84
look darker 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photograph, look better in white)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(photograph, look better in black)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(photograph, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(photograph, look better in white)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(photograph, look better in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(photograph, look better in black)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(photo, look better in white)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(photo, look better in black)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(photo, look better in black)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(photo, look better in black)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(photo, look better in light)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(photo, look better in light)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(photo, look better in natural light)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(photo, look better in light)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(photo, look better in natural light)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(photo, look better in natural light)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(photo, look better in black)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(photo, look better in light)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(photo, look better in natural light)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photo, look better in white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(photo, look better in white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(photograph, look better in white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(photograph, look better in black)